-3- 12 and 13 the Committee does not consider that the Tribunal would be willing to receive these documents. 20.IPS Doc. No. 1952 Record of proceedings of USSR Supreme Court Military Collegium Decision: The Committee is of the opinion that this evidence is clearly not rebuttal but should be made the subject matter of an application to the Court to adduce such evidence as part of the Case for the prosecution In order to comply with the direction of the Court that the matter be dealt with later, at page 7749 of the Record. 21.IBS Doc. No. 3099 Map attached to the Molotcrr-Togo Agreement. Decision: This document should certainly be tendered in fulfillment of the undertaking given. 22. IPS Doc. No. 3024 & Sketch Map of the Kirin Province 23. IPS Doc. 3165 Report of Beisse. Decision: The Committee thinks that these documents may properly be tendered in rebuttal. 24. Affidavit of Maj. Gen. Grebennik. Decision: In view of the explanation given by Col. Smirnov, the Committee thinks that this Affidavit is properly admissible in rebuttal, although the Court will probably limit his evidence to those matters specifically rebutting the new evidence submitted by the Defence and not allow him to tell a general story of the whole incident. 25.IPS Doc. No. 3164 Report of Border Guard Department of Mongolian People’s Republic. Decision: In the opinion of the Committee this document is too general and deals with the whole of the Prosecution case on this incident and is therefore not properly admissible in rebuttal. 26.IPS Doc. 3149 Report of Border Guard Department of Mongolian People’s Republic Decision: The same remarks apply as in Item 25. 27.IPS Doc. No. 3157 & Interrogation of Maj. Chagden 28.IPS Doc. No. 3151 Interrogation of Maj. Bykov Decision: The Committee thinks that those portions of the affidavits of these